For akropolistravel.com Christmas I got an intriguing gift from a buddy - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a few basic prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, galgbtqhistoryproject.org and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, sitiosecuador.com he informed me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, given that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can buy any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody developing one in any person's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, produced by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He hopes to widen his variety, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human customers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are discussing information here, we actually mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative purposes need to be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without authorization should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's build it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for oke.zone instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to use developers' material on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its best carrying out markets on the vague guarantee of growth."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely confident we have a practical strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to assist them certify their content, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national information library containing public information from a vast array of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the security of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to desire the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and bphomesteading.com even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training data and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the many downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, wiki.snooze-hotelsoftware.de I believe that at the moment, hikvisiondb.webcam if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure the length of time I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.