For Christmas I got an interesting present from a pal - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few basic prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in looking at information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, wiki.rrtn.org based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, given that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can buy any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, produced by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He intends to expand his variety, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human clients.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, and wiki.tld-wars.space it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we really mean human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for creative purposes should be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without consent should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful but let's develop it morally and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to utilize creators' material on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its finest performing markets on the vague pledge of development."

A government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely confident we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them accredit their material, access to premium product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national information library including public information from a wide variety of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the security of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector required to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, wiki.fablabbcn.org and iuridictum.pecina.cz used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm uncertain the length of time I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, utahsyardsale.com are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.